RSS
 

JARON LANIER: YOU ARE NOT A GADGET

11 Jul

http://www.amazon.com/You-Are-Not-Gadget-Manifesto/dp/0307269647

Question: You say that we’ve devalued intellectual achievement. How?

Jaron Lanier: On one level, the Internet has become anti-intellectual because Web 2.0 collectivism has killed the individual voice. It is increasingly disheartening to write about any topic in depth these days, because people will only read what the first link from a search engine directs them to, and that will typically be the collective expression of the Wikipedia. Or, if the issue is contentious, people will congregate into partisan online bubbles in which their views are reinforced. I don’t think a collective voice can be effective for many topics, such as history–and neither can a partisan mob. Collectives have a power to distort history in a way that damages minority viewpoints and calcifies the art of interpretation. Only the quirkiness of considered individual expression can cut through the nonsense of mob–and that is the reason intellectual activity is important.

On another level, when someone does try to be expressive in a collective, Web 2.0 context, she must prioritize standing out from the crowd. To do anything else is to be invisible. Therefore, people become artificially caustic, flattering, or otherwise manipulative.

Web 2.0 adherents might respond to these objections by claiming that I have confused individual expression with intellectual achievement. This is where we find our greatest point of disagreement. I am amazed by the power of the collective to enthrall people to the point of blindness. Collectivists adore a computer operating system called LINUX, for instance, but it is really only one example of a descendant of a 1970s technology called UNIX. If it weren’t produced by a collective, there would be nothing remarkable about it at all.

Meanwhile, the truly remarkable designs that couldn’t have existed 30 years ago, like the iPhone, all come out of "closed" shops where individuals create something and polish it before it is released to the public. Collectivists confuse ideology with achievement.

Google+: Reshared 1 times
Google+: View post on Google+

 

Tags:

Leave a Reply

 

 
  1. Ken Foreman

    July 11, 2012 at 2:20 pm

    Worth repeating:
    On another level, when someone does try to be expressive in a collective, Web 2.0 context, she must prioritize standing out from the crowd. To do anything else is to be invisible. Therefore, people become artificially caustic, flattering, or otherwise manipulative.

     
  2. Ken Foreman

    July 11, 2012 at 2:39 pm

    You are not an iPad or iPhone. You are worth more than that.

    You are not an Android tablet or Nexus, hopefully you think more than that.

    Do not mistake technical novelty for self-worth or intelligent thought. Do not give up the ability to think for yourself or entertain an original thought, rather than going with the flow or being a sheep of one flavor or the other.